Best 4K TV For Gaming In 2022

From LG to Samsung, here are the best 4K TVs for gaming on PS5 and Xbox Series X.

67 Comments

To get the full advantage of the power provided by the PS5 and Xbox Series X, you need the right display. Upgrading to a new 4K TV for gaming is a good idea if you want the best display performance possible. While you could go to the store and pick up any modern TV, the best 4K TVs for gaming in 2022 have specific features that make them most suited for the PS5 and Xbox Series X.

The big thing to look for is HDMI 2.1, which supports a 120Hz refresh rate for select new games. While not a requirement, 4K TVs with HDMI 2.1 can run games more smoothly and have them look even better in motion. Most 4K gaming TVs don't support HDMI 2.1 on every port, so be sure you are connecting your PS5 or Xbox Series X to the right ports on your TV.

What is HDMI 2.1, and why is it important?

If you want a 4K resolution with 120Hz refresh rate and HDR, you're going to need a TV with an HDMI 2.1 port. This ensures that your TV can accept the speeds afforded by HDMI 2.1 cables--48Gbps--which are what the PS5 and Xbox Series X utilize to transfer video and audio signals to your television. HDMI 2.1 is still relatively new to consumer displays, with only a select few TVs supporting it and no PC monitors currently available on the market that support it--though Asus has announced HDMI 2.1 monitors that should release in the near future. (If you're still interested in using your new console with a monitor, see our picks for the best 4K gaming monitors available now.)

Two of the benefits that HDMI 2.1 provides to gamers are built-in variable refresh rate (VRR) and low-latency technologies. VRR provides you with a smooth, stutter-less image during gameplay, while Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM) provides zero lag between your inputs and the action on-screen.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Do I need an HDMI 2.1 TV for PS5 and Xbox Series X?

Xbox Series X and PS5 games play just fine on any TV that has HDMI ports; a 120Hz TV is not required. While a gaming monitor in comparison to a TV will ultimately have higher refresh rates, you'll be more than happy with any good 4K TV running at 60Hz as long as it has decent input lag or a specific game mode. At this time, the majority of games target 4K and 60 frames per second, though we're sure to see a number of different resolutions and frame rates across titles, consoles, and performance modes.

Despite this, the benefits of HDMI 2.1 are clear to see in compatible games. 120Hz provides a much smoother experience than 60Hz and is most helpful in competitive gaming. Most compatible games only offer 120Hz modes in specific modes, such as multiplayer in Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War and Gears 5. Devil May Cry 5: Special Edition, on the other hand, lets you enable 120Hz in its single-player campaign.

What about 8K?

The PS5 and Xbox Series X both claim that they're capable of an 8K resolution, and HDMI 2.1 does support the transfer of 8K and 60Hz. Despite this, the PS5 and Xbox Series X don't currently feature any games that output a true 8K resolution, and I don't expect either one to be able to do this with a stable 60 FPS frame rate. 8K resolution TVs are currently being sold, but they are incredibly expensive. Even if you have an exorbitant amount of money to burn, we'd still suggest going with one of the 4K, 120Hz options available and save the rest of your money for the consoles and games themselves.

Best TVs for PS5 and Xbox Series X

TVStarting priceInput frequencyVRR?Input types
LG CX OLED 4K TV$1,400120HzYesHDMI 2.1
LG BX OLED 4K TV$1,300120HzYesHDMI 2.1, HDMI 2.0
LG NanoCell 85 4K TV$650120HzYesHDMI 2.1, HDMI 2.0
Samsung Q80T 4K TV$1,200120HzYesHDMI 2.1, HDMI 2.0
Samsung Q70T 4K TV$1,000120HzYesHDMI 2.1, HDMI 2.0
Sony X900H 4K TV$1,000120HzNoHDMI 2.1, HDMI 2.0

The products discussed here were independently chosen by our editors. GameSpot may get a share of the revenue if you buy anything featured on our site.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 67 comments about this story
67 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
  • 67 results
  • 1
  • 2
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for stickemup
StickEmUp

1210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

This list needs updated. The LG G2 and C2 are the best gaming TVs now, and soon the upcoming LG OLEDs that were shown at CES will take the top spot.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for alexl86
alexl86

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

While this post currently says it is from September 24th 2021, these TVs are last years models and have been replaced. Given all the references to Black Friday, it was likely posted a year ago. As these are older TVs now, the availability is more scarce. I would look elsewhere for a more updated list.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jcwainc
jcwainc

116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By jcwainc

this list is bs! dont believe the hype get HISENSE 65U8G heres a better list https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/best/by-size/65-inch

rtings.com

im going to take a leek this list sucks!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for id0ntkn0w7
ID0ntKn0w7

1832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

The best QLED is... the Samsung QLED! Nobody makes QLEDs like Samsung! In other news, the best Bravia is a Sony, as is the best Playstation, and Honda makes the best Civics!

Also, Nanocells are on here, and those TVs are pretty poor.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

7144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@id0ntkn0w7: Nanocells were a stop gap between technologies, but did offer a price and quality between leds and qleds until whatever 4-8k tech prevails. From better and cheaper QLEDs to micro leds to whatever the tech hypno-toad king uses ... all hail the hypno-toad.

The nanocells are still decent tvs, not the best and far from the worse. If all a person does is watch crappy cable tv reality shows, 8th gen games, and not alot of 4k HDR 60mhz (which is 95% of consumers) then a lower priced nanocell tv is a budget friendly option. And some of the LG nanocell tv lines will do a person very well into the 9th gen of gaming both console and pc.

I am sitting on my money until next year when prices curve towards .... reality, before jumping into a buying purchase that, right now does not equal dollar per entertainment value. I have great setups and gear right now, but if I saw a low priced nanocell tv, I would buy.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for nintendians
nintendians

4800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 139

User Lists: 0

Edited By nintendians

well... too late, i already got the LG A1 48 inch Class 4K Smart OLED TV w/ ThinQ AI already and it's coming to me on 8-10-21.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tingtong
tingtong

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 20

Piece of advice - don’t give yourself a headache researching TVs. Its simple really… if it doesn’t say OLED; then say no thank you sir. And as long as its from a reputable company from the past year or two you likely can’t go wrong.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for id0ntkn0w7
ID0ntKn0w7

1832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@tingtong: OLEDs are pretty and all, but I like my Bravia just fine (mind you, Sony's customer service sucks, and the smart interface no longer works with anything but Netflix, but I have my Playstation for that).

"You should know that OLEDs don't get very bright" -every OLED review ever. Without that brightness HDR really lacks the eyeball-melting beauty that really sells 4K. Still, I do love that contrast ratio.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tingtong
tingtong

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 20

@id0ntkn0w7:

No TV is perfect and they come out with minor improvements every couple years or so.. But simple fact is OLED is currently the newest & best tech in that category which 100% of reviews agree with; except for those of certain circumstances… Basically they’ll just tell you to go with LED if you often watch in brightly lit rooms and aren’t so much a movie person or whatever and OLED for everyone else (who can afford it, and fortunately they’re becoming much more affordable now).

As for the brightness thing.. I don’t know how many nits mine is but its enough to blind me and sometimes I even have to adjust the settings a bit. But I’ll take perfect blacks over staring directly at the sun any day. But in the end its whatever you’re content/happy with…

Upvote • 
Avatar image for yakitysmakity
yakitysmakity

39

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By yakitysmakity

@tingtong:Last year I was shopping for my first 4K TV and I got a TCL 6, and I was already impressed by the IQ and black levels. But during the return window the newer version of it came out (many improvements) and the LG CX went on sale, so I decided to upgrade to OLED, and I think it's totally worth it for the HDMI 2.1, 4K 120hz, G-sync, etc. And it looks gorgeous, but I can't really tell how much deeper the blacks are without comparing them, and sometimes the near-black levels have trouble smoothly transitioning to complete black. And I do miss the brightness, even in a dark room. Going from night to day in a movie should make you feel your eyes adjusting, but often times with the CX it just feels a little dimmer than it should. You can turn on the Dynamic Contrast to bump it up, but it noticeably changes the image. I think for gaming, the CX is the clear winner, but for movies the brightness is a legitimate trade-off.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tingtong
tingtong

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 20

@yakitysmakity: Well, I watch a good deal of anime and the OLED is hands down the winner as well.. in fact; nothing’s looked better.. the only kind of content I watch on it is of the highest quality.. none of that streaming crap. And yeah, I always keep the contrast and all that max’d out but its never hurt the picture IMO and is plenty bright enough for my needs… There’s more trade-offs going LED I think and I can’t imagine going back…OLED will keep getting better while LED will still be LED no matter how you try to dress it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Spartan_418
Spartan_418

4397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Annoyed that the Vizio P55 I bought 2 years ago said it could do 120hz, but didn't make it clear that it could only do so in 1080p mode, not 120hz and 4k at the same time

Like I know HDMI 2.1 didn't exist yet back then, but I still feel deceived by it. Reeeee

Upvote • 
Avatar image for nintendians
nintendians

4800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 139

User Lists: 0

Edited By nintendians

@Spartan_418: i think only 8k tvs could do 4k120 since it's 2x the width and height of 4k and probably need 2x the power of 4k for 8k.

should have save around $3,500 to $25,000 u.s dollar for a 8k tv.

base on this: https://www.lg.com/us/8k-tvs

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Spartan_418
Spartan_418

4397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@nintendians: No, doesn't have to be 8k.

Proper 4k 120 TVs exist, but they've only started coming out within the last year or so. You can tell by whether they have HDMI 2.1 or not.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for nintendians
nintendians

4800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 139

User Lists: 0

@Spartan_418: yeah, but then what's the point, when 8k came out like 2 or 3 years ago, that already cost the price i post. minus play a ps5 and xbox series x games in 8k30 (if it lets) or 4k60, while pc already near there at 8k60 gaming, maybe when a next cards series comes out like the nvidia geforce rtx 40 series (mostly the 4090, 4080ti and 4080 might reach it) with the next gpu from intel and amd and might need a 32gb of ram and 10 tb. of ssd space.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

7144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Spartan_418: There needs to be some industry standards when it comes to listing specs on a tv. In Europe and AU the TV boxes list the specs a lot clearer then here in the states. You may have to flip a TV box around and still never see the real specs, and this is the same with websites, who allow manufacturers and even third parties to list a TV specs and in such a way to ... outright deceive consumers.

Newegg often times has the best specs spreadsheet and Walmart online the worst. Even going to a manufacturers website, it will still take you a while to find accurate specs. And when a consumer electronic product does not perform as advertised, we should be able to get a refund after a certain time period..... maybe not after 2 yrs but with in reason. And of course NEVER, should we have to pay restocking fees anywhere.

2 • 
Avatar image for id0ntkn0w7
ID0ntKn0w7

1832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By ID0ntKn0w7

@jenovaschilld: rtings is your friend. Best website for TVs, atmos soundbars and the like

3 • 
Avatar image for Destructionzz
Destructionzz

707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: -1

@id0ntkn0w7: Used that site to research my first 4K TV purchase that I just got, the compare feature was great.

2 • 
Avatar image for jcwainc
jcwainc

116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

dont believe any of these tvs. the best price for a tv for gaming is the tcl series 6 hands downs. is it the best over all no but for 600 dollars its just barely under the top ends tvs. its true its damn true

TCL took home the award for Best Value TV 2019 for their TCL 6-Series. In the Future Choice category, Future Tech's expert editorial staff voted TCL's 6-Series as the overall Best Smart TV of 2019.

That's why the 2019 TCL 6-Series earns the CNET Editors' Choice award. Design. The TCL 6-Series certainly doesn't look cheap.

TCL's 6-Series (available in the US market) was namedCES Editors' Choiceby Reviewed.com and Best of CES 2018 by AVS Forum

TCL took home the award for Best Value TV 2019 for their TCL 6-Series.

In the Future Choice category, Future Tech’s expert editorial staff voted TCL’s 6-Series as the overall Best Smart TV of 2019.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for id0ntkn0w7
ID0ntKn0w7

1832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@jcwainc: ...so, you work for TCL, huh?

2 • 
Avatar image for enya64
enya64

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By enya64

I'm staying away from the LG OLEDs because I use my tvs as PC monitors also and will not be dealing with OLED burn-in. Most Vizios I've had always experienced wifi connection or firmware issues at some extended point. I was this close to picking up the Samsung QLED for PS5, XSX, and RTX 3080 gaming, then found out that of the 4 HDMI ports only one is HDMI 2.1. I would have to be swapping cables to play above 60 fps.

All three tvs tested in gaming: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cf1bSseyyDE

Only the Sony 900h has great picture quality, Variable Refresh Rate and GSync support, and 2 HDMI 2.1 ports in one tv. And the smart TV features are excellent and easy to navigate, unlike the Vizio. I completely ignore its clunky smart tv interface and plugged up a 4kFirestick instead.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for id0ntkn0w7
ID0ntKn0w7

1832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@enya64: that was probably wise, so long as the firestick allows you to watch Netflix in dolby vision. The other apps are dogshit on the android interface now. Took about an hour just to load HBO Max every time and never once did I get Disney+ working. Now Amazon is slow and full of artifacts, so I just use my PS5

Upvote • 
Avatar image for TexasAnMGrad2K
TexasAnMGrad2K

844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Perfectly happy with my LG OLED. Best picture I've ever seen!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Keivz_basic
Keivz_basic

1291

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

Surprised the vizio pqx isn’t listed here. It has better contrast, better local dimming, and much better brightness than any of the led tv’s listed here and is cheaper than the q80t while supporting Dolby vision (q80t does not support Dolby vision) and full hdmi 2.1.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for warpedtrekker
WarpedTrekker

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Keivz_basic said:

Surprised the vizio pqx isn’t listed here. It has better contrast, better local dimming, and much better brightness than any of the led tv’s listed here and is cheaper than the q80t while supporting Dolby vision (q80t does not support Dolby vision) and full hdmi 2.1.

Actually the Vizio PQX has many bugs and issues. The Sony x900h/x950h ranks tops over that Vizio.

2 • 
Avatar image for Keivz_basic
Keivz_basic

1291

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

@warpedtrekker:

Just about all the bugs were fixed in the latest firmware update. Get the Vizio

Upvote • 
Avatar image for warpedtrekker
WarpedTrekker

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By WarpedTrekker

@Keivz_basic said:

@warpedtrekker:

Just about all the bugs were fixed in the latest firmware update. Get the Vizio

I already bought the 85" Sony X900h and glad I did. It's an excellent TV with excellent picture quality. PS4 games look fantastic. Can't wait for the PS5. Connected to a Denon X4700h receiver and my Paradigm 5.1.4 speakers, and it's great.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for maximo
maximo

2657

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

The Sony actually already supports 4k with 120Hz refresh rate out of the box.

Look at the tvs specs. I have one!

2 • 
Avatar image for warpedtrekker
WarpedTrekker

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@maximo said:

The Sony actually already supports 4k with 120Hz refresh rate out of the box.

Look at the tvs specs. I have one!

I have the 85" X900h. Great TV for the price. Excellent SDR that pops, and Great HDR with twinkling highlights., smooth interface, etc. My current PS4 games look fantastic. Can't wait for the HDMI 2.1 update and PS5 to arrive.

2 • 
Avatar image for fredlead
FredLead

17

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jinzo9988: I am a home theater installer and I repair TVs. I have only seen one OLED with burn-in and that was because the owner left it on the same news channel about 16 hours a day; 8 hours for the dog while away and 8 while home. I have gone to see OLEDs that are a few years old and they did not have any burn-in. The only risk is from static white images, like news icons and desktop icons if used as a monitor, and that takes a high number of consecutive hours to happen.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for aerostar65
aerostar65

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Wow I might be out of the loop a bit

I thought Candle, Emerson and RCA TV's were top of the line

Kidding aside, Samsung All the way

2 • 
Avatar image for warpedtrekker
WarpedTrekker

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Sony X900h is not just a "midrange" TV. Not sure why everyone calls it that. It is actually a higher-end TV comparable to Q80T. X900h is a great TV for the price. HDMI 2.1, eARC, etc, is all coming in a firmware update. It has 720Hz LED backlight flicker which is much better than others. It stays at 720Hz no matter what brightness you have it set to. X900h also gets very bright in HDR, has excellent motion handling and color. Plus ANDROID TV with ton of apps and great smooth interface! Samsung has their proprietary OS Tizen, with much smaller app store.

2 • 
Avatar image for Keivz_basic
Keivz_basic

1291

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

@warpedtrekker:

The x900h brightness in hdr/ssd is lackluster. Buyer beware. Go for the tcl/Samsung/or vizio instead.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for warpedtrekker
WarpedTrekker

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Keivz_basic said:

@warpedtrekker:

The x900h brightness in hdr/ssd is lackluster. Buyer beware. Go for the tcl/Samsung/or vizio instead.

You apparently never have seen x900h in a controlled environment. (Not best buy with a ton of lighting). The 85" is plenty bright in HDR and looks fantastic. I'll take a little less HDR over having to deal with Dirty Screen Effect (DSE), and the other con's of the Chinese/Korean brands of TV's.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Keivz_basic
Keivz_basic

1291

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

@warpedtrekker:

I've seen the measured nit output which is an objective measure and less than the output of my current OLED (which also has lackluster hdr). Caveat emptor.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for warpedtrekker
WarpedTrekker

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By WarpedTrekker

@pharoe777: Uh no. X900h is much better than the 80T. 80T has bad uniformity, and Dirty Screen Effect (DSE).

2 • 
Avatar image for gamer_4_life
Gamer_4_Life

126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

If you're looking for a TV or sound system this is the compatibilty with the new consoles, regarding HDR and Sound Options:

HDR:

Xbox (Series X and Series S):

Dolby Vision (12 bits, dynamic metadata)

HDR10+ (10 bits, dynamic metadata)

HDR10 (10 bits, static metadata)

PlayStation 5 (Base and Digital):

HDR10+ (10 bits, dynamic metadata)

HDR10 (10 bits, static metadata)

Sound:

Xbox (Series X and Series S):

Dolby Atmos

DTS:X

Windows Sonic (Microsoft)

PlayStation 5 (Base and Digital):

Tempest Engine (Sony)

2 • 
Avatar image for jinzo9988
jinzo9988

2457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jinzo9988

I don't care how much they test it, I can't go with an OLED if there's risk of burn-in. I've had my current LED TV for 10 years and it's still fine 10 years later. I refuse to believe the picture won't be affected in some way after even 5 years with an OLED. I'm in the market to replace my TV and I'm likely going with either the Q80T or the Q90T. Prime Day is around the corner and we might see some deals on TVs.

2 • 
Avatar image for bababooey12
bababooey12

967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jinzo9988: I've had my OLED since 2016...have 8400 hours on tv...no issues at all. Just because some idiot leaves his tv on for 8 hours straight or longer, doesn't make it the tv or manufacturer's fault. I will most likely be upgrading my tv to the CX OLED. I want quality...know what I'm getting with LG.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for soulmuncher666
soulmuncher666

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 10

@bababooey12: you're saying you shouldn't be able to use your tv for 8 hours straight?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bababooey12
bababooey12

967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@soulmuncher666: sure you can, but if you leave it on for like 8 hours straight on the same image, don't be surprised if you end of with image burn. Thats part of the reason why, especially LG tvs have auto turn off, as well as changing pictures as its screen saver. Now a days image burn shouldn't be an issue LG has taken extra steps to help with that..part of the reason why OLEDs are the best tvs on the market.

Upvote • 
  • 67 results
  • 1
  • 2